전체기사 최신뉴스 GAM
KYD 디데이
글로벌

속보

더보기

플로서 총재, "경제 전망과 정책 과제" 연설문(원문)

기사입력 : 2008년02월07일 12:54

최종수정 : 2008년02월07일 12:54

The Economic Outlook and Challenges for Policymakers
Presented by Charles I. Plosser, President and
Chief Executive Officer
Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia
Birmingham Rotary Club
February 6, 2008
Introduction

It is indeed a pleasure to be back in Birmingham, my hometown. Not only have I had the opportunity to visit with family and friends, but this trip has also given me the opportunity to enjoy some warmer temperatures than I have been experiencing in Philadelphia. From Philip Jackson’s introduction, you will note that my latest career move has been in a southerly direction — moving away from the deep snows of Rochester, New York, and into the more moderate coastal climate of Philadelphia. If that doesn’t sound like much progress climate-wise, you don’t know Rochester.

Of course, friends and colleagues, not to mention family members, have questioned my judgment regarding what represents a desirable climate since I moved to Chicago as a graduate student nearly 40 years ago. And they developed even more serious doubts when my wife and I moved from Palo Alto, California, to Rochester. But regardless of where life and opportunities have taken me, Birmingham will always be my hometown and I am delighted to be back.

I especially want to thank Philip Jackson for giving me the opportunity to be here with you today. Those of you who know Philip understand he is no stranger to the Federal Reserve, having served on the Board of Governors from 1975-78 under Chairman Arthur Burns. And he is certainly no stranger to some of what I’ll be discussing with you today. Thank you, Philip, for the invitation to return to Birmingham and for the opportunity to speak to the Rotary Club.

Birmingham and the surrounding region have changed quite a bit since I left to go to college over four decades ago. The UAB Medical Center was only a vision of what might be. The industrial base was weak and in decline, and many of us were envious of the more rapidly growing metro areas in other parts of the country. Since then Birmingham has undergone a resurgence. Its economic base has broadened and diversified. As a result, it has grown and prospered. I have little doubt there are many people throughout the country who now envy the quality of life Birmingham has to offer.

My own sojourns over the last four decades have taken me from Birmingham, to Chicago, to New York City, Palo Alto, Rochester, and now Philadelphia. Most of my career has been spent as an academic economist, doing research and teaching in the areas of macroeconomics, monetary theory, and finance.

After studying and conducting research on the macroeconomy and monetary policy for about 30 years, I am indeed fortunate to have the privilege of serving as the president and CEO of one of the 12 Reserve Banks in the Federal Reserve System. It is a great experience. The Philadelphia Reserve Bank has about 1100 employees, and like our sister Bank in Atlanta, External Link it has three major responsibilities. One of those is the supervision and regulation of banks and bank holding companies. Another is helping to ensure the smooth operation of the nation’s payment systems — basically by providing financial services to banks and the U.S. Treasury.

The Reserve Banks’ third major responsibility is monetary policy. This responsibility has two dimensions. First, each Reserve Bank’s board of directors regularly makes recommendations about its discount rate — that is, the interest rate at which the Reserve Bank lends to banks and other depository institutions. Such recommendations are ultimately approved or denied by the System’s Board of Governors in Washington, D.C., but each Reserve Bank has an opportunity to provide its region’s input on those decisions as part of the process.

The second way in which a Reserve Bank contributes to monetary policy is through its president’s role as a member of the System’s Federal Open Market Committee External Link — or FOMC, as it is usually called. It is the body within the Fed that makes monetary policy for the nation. Congress established the Federal Reserve as a decentralized central bank. Giving each Reserve Bank a seat at the FOMC table is another way for the Reserve Bank to convey its region’s perspective on both local and national economic and financial developments. The Bank presidents also bring an important diversity of views to the table. The Committee’s ability to make thoughtful and sound policy choices is greatly strengthened by the interaction of members with different perspectives. I am fond of recounting the words of that famous writer and journalist Walter Lippman, who once said, “Where all men think alike, no one thinks very much.” I believe the give and take at FOMC meetings reflects the fact that a lot of thinking goes into the decisions the Committee makes. If we all agreed all the time, there would be little reason for the Committee to meet.

For someone who has been a student of monetary policy for many years, serving on the FOMC is simply a great opportunity. Sometimes I am asked if my views regarding policy have changed now that I am an insider, so to speak, rather than the outsider looking in. The answer is that sound economic analysis is independent of where you sit, so that my fundamental views have not changed. That does not mean that applying or implementing sound policy is necessarily easy. Indeed, when I took the position in August 2006, little did I know how challenging the FOMC’s job would be during 2007 and 2008.
The FOMC and Monetary Policy Objectives

In conducting monetary policy, the FOMC seeks to foster financial conditions, including growth of money and credit and a level of short-term interest rates, consistent with achieving two goals: price stability and maximum sustainable economic growth. I believe that the most important contribution the Fed can make to sustained economic growth and employment rests on credibly committing to and achieving long-run price stability. In fact, without a credible commitment to maintaining price stability, the Fed’s ability to promote sustainable growth would be seriously undermined. Moreover, price stability is not only an important element in achieving sustained economic growth, it is also critical in promoting financial stability.

The primary tool for implementing monetary policy is the federal funds rate, which is the interest rate at which banks trade overnight funds. The FOMC controls the funds rate by buying and selling government securities in what is known as open market operations. The FOMC meets approximately every six weeks, but, of course, can meet more often as necessitated by economic developments, as we did in January. The Committee’s objective at each meeting is to set an appropriate target level for the fed funds rate that supports its longer-term goals.

It is important to recognize that the influence of changes in the FOMC’s targeted funds rate on inflation and economic growth occurs with a lag, so by necessity the FOMC must be forward-looking in setting an appropriate funds rate target. It must forecast future economic growth and inflation based on available economic data and financial conditions, including a particular path for the fed funds rate.

But paraphrasing physicist Nils Bohr, forecasting is a tricky exercise — especially if it’s about the future. Thus we must recognize that circumstances change and sometimes they can change very quickly. As new economic data become available, the Committee must consider the data carefully and assess how they impact our forecast of future economic outcomes. When the outlook for output and inflation does change appreciably, the Committee may choose to adjust its fed funds rate target to achieve its longer-term goals. Since last August, economic data have been particularly volatile, making the assessment of the outlook unusually difficult and subject to revision. A change in the economic outlook is what was at work in the last two weeks when the FOMC decided to reduce its target fed funds rate in two steps to its current level of 3 percent.

Let me elaborate on recent economic and financial conditions and my current outlook for the economy and inflation.
The Outlook

Since last August, financial and economic conditions have deteriorated. As that occurred, policymakers revised downward their forecasts for 2008 economic growth. This took place in several steps as new data were released and, in turn, led the FOMC to lower the federal funds rate in a series of steps.

By last September, we had already seen a cumulative deterioration in the housing sector during the earlier part of 2007. In addition, the disruptions in financial markets in August caused by the problems in the subprime mortgage market raised the risk of potential adverse effects on the broader economy from a further tightening of credit conditions. As a result, I lowered my projection of economic growth for the fourth quarter of 2007 and the first half of 2008. In particular, the adjustment to my forecast involved pushing back the turnaround in residential construction, as low demand for homes meant it would take longer than expected for the economy to work off the inventories of new and existing homes for sale. The continuing high prices of oil and other commodities also suggested the potential for some slowing in the pace of economic activity, as well as hinting at increasing inflationary pressures — a point I will return to later. As the outlook changed, the FOMC lowered the fed funds rate target by 50 basis points in September, and then by another 25 basis points in both October and early December.

Since the Committee’s meeting in early December, External Link the economic data have indicated that the deterioration in the housing market has continued unabated. Although that by itself was discouraging, other economic indicators also showed signs of an economy that was weakening. The renewed widening of some credit spreads in financial markets, along with weaker figures for retail sales, manufacturing activity, and job growth in December, led many forecasters in early January to further mark down their forecasts for 2008. The sharp rise in December’s unemployment rate, which was released in early January, also heightened many economists’ concerns about the economy’s health. What’s more, the Philadelphia Reserve Bank’s closely watched manufacturing survey recorded a surprisingly steep decline in industrial activity in January, to a level not seen since the last recession.

Although the economy’s resilience to past shocks makes me cautious about making changes to my outlook based on just one or two pieces of economic news, the string of weaker than anticipated numbers released in late December and in January had a cumulative effect on my own assessment of the 2008 outlook. While I would not be very surprised if the economy bounces back more quickly than many forecasters are now projecting, I am now, nevertheless, anticipating a weaker first half of 2008 than I did in October. This downward revision to the economic outlook is what led me to conclude that a substantially lower level of interest rates was needed to support the process of returning the economy to its trend rate of growth. Consequently, I believe the recent reductions in the federal funds rate were a necessary and appropriate recognition of this changed outlook.

The ongoing housing correction and the volatility and uncertainty in the credit markets are significant near-term drags on the economy and I expect growth in the first half of the year to be quite weak, around 1 percent. As conditions in the housing and financial markets begin to stabilize, I expect growth to improve in the second half of the year and to move back to trend, which I estimate is around 2.7 percent, in 2009. Overall, I am now anticipating economic growth in 2008 of near 2 percent.

Given the slowdown in economic growth this year, payroll employment will rise more slowly than last year and will remain below trend for much of the year before picking up in 2009. Slower job growth will also lead to an unemployment rate near 5-1/4 percent in 2008, after fluctuating between 4‑1/2 and 5 percent in 2007.

Two adjustments will continue to be needed to help work down the large number of unsold homes: further cuts in construction and declines in housing prices. I expect the decline in housing starts will bottom out in the middle of this year, but starts are likely to then be quite flat through the end of 2009 as the inventory of unsold homes is reduced gradually.

Of course, as was the case in 2007, how quickly housing bottoms out remains one of the main uncertainties surrounding any forecast in today’s environment. It seems that ever since last spring, the turnaround in housing was always six months away. Well, nine months later, it is still six months away. Simply having housing stop contracting will help economic growth. In 2007 the decline in residential construction took 1 percentage point off real GDP growth, which turned out to be 2.5 percent for the year (4th quarter to 4th quarter). Once residential construction stops declining, it will cease subtracting from overall growth. But housing is unlikely to make a positive contribution to economic growth until 2009.

Business investment should continue to increase this year, but at a slower pace than in 2007. Outside of autos and housing, there isn’t a large inventory overhang in the economy to be worked off. This is actually good news. Recessions are often preceded by periods of large inventory accumulation and much of the decline in production during recessions reflects a working off of an inventory imbalance. The absence of such an inventory overhang is encouraging.

The biggest component of GDP is consumer spending. With slower growth of employment and personal income in the first half of 2008, and as the decline in the value of homes and equities diminishes households’ net worth, consumer spending is likely to grow more slowly before picking up again in 2009.

One piece of good news has been the growth in exports. The trade sector supported economic growth last year as domestic demand weakened in the U.S. while foreign growth remained strong. The declining dollar also helped fuel a rebound in our exports. The net export component of GDP should continue to improve this year, although more slowly than it did in 2007 because we are likely to see somewhat slower growth among our major trading partners this year.
Inflation

Let me now turn to the outlook for inflation. Unfortunately, I expect little progress to be made in reducing core inflation this year or next, and I am skeptical that slower economic growth will help. All you have to do is recall the 1970s when we experienced both high unemployment and high inflation to appreciate that slow economic growth and lower inflation do not necessarily go hand in hand. I anticipate that core inflation (which excludes the prices of food and energy) is likely to remain in the 2 to 2‑1/2 percent range in 2008, which is above the range I consider to be consistent with price stability. If oil prices stabilize near their current levels, I expect headline, or total, inflation to decrease to around the 2 to 2‑1/2 percent range in 2008.

While the Fed’s goal is to achieve stable prices for all goods and services, economists and policymakers sometimes focus on core inflation, as it has been thought to give a better indication of underlying inflation pressures since it excludes food and energy prices, which can be quite volatile. The idea is that over time, core and headline inflation rates should, on average, be similar, as increases in the volatile components are offset by later decreases and vice versa. I am concerned, however, that over the past 10 years headline inflation has exceeded core inflation by about 40 to 50 basis points. This has been true of both the consumer price index (CPI) and the broader personal consumption expenditure (PCE) price index. Indeed, headline inflation rates have exceeded core inflation rates in 8 of the last 10 years for both the CPI and the PCE price measures on an annual average basis. While I would like to believe that, over time, these two rates should be converging on average, I am concerned that the data are suggesting that core inflation rates may not be as indicative of underlying or trend inflation as we might have thought. My conclusion is that we need to look at both measures of inflation — headline and core — since it is not clear which one is telling us the most about underlying inflationary pressures. As a consequence, I was very much in favor of the FOMC’s beginning to include forecasts of both core and headline inflation in our quarterly forecasts.

As the FOMC’s January 30 statement External Link said, it will be necessary to continue to monitor inflation developments carefully. Most measures of inflation, including the core CPI and core PCE price measures, accelerated in the second half of 2007 compared to the first half. With inflation creeping up, we have to be particularly alert for rising inflation expectations. It is important that inflation expectations remain stable. If those expectations become unhinged, they could rapidly fuel inflation. Moreover, as we learned from the experience of the 1970s, once the public loses confidence in the Fed’s commitment to price stability, it is very costly to the economy for the Fed to regain that confidence. The painful period of the early 1980s was the price the economy paid to restore the credibility of the Fed’s commitment — we certainly do not wish to go through that process again.

Fortunately, so far inflation expectations have not changed very much. But they bear watching because there are some signs that they, too, are edging higher. These may be early warning signs of a weakening of our credibility, and we must be very careful to avoid that.
Monetary Policy Going Forward

How do I think about monetary policy going forward? Recall that monetary policy works with a lag. The full impact of changes in monetary policy on output and employment may not materialize for several quarters at the earliest. Thus, actions taken today depend in a critical way on how one sees the economy evolving over the next year or two. Put another way, actions taken today will have little appreciable impact on the real economy over the next couple of quarters.

As I have already emphasized, this lagged response means that monetary policy decisions depend critically on the outlook for the economy over the intermediate term. Forecasting, however, is a difficult task. Data are noisy and are often revised, which means it is difficult, in real time, to extract clear signals about the economy from these noisy data. In times of economic turbulence and uncertainty, the problem of extracting a signal becomes especially acute. That does not mean that you can stop forecasting, but it does mean that the uncertainty surrounding any forecast will be unusually large and may be very sensitive to incoming data.

Over the course of the last five months, as forecasts for economic growth have been revised downward, the FOMC has lowered the fed funds rate by 225 basis points — from 5.25 percent to 3 percent. Taking expected inflation into account, the level of the federal funds rate in real terms — what economists call the real rate of interest — is now approaching zero. That is clearly an accommodative level of real interest rates. The last time the level of real interest rates was this low was in 2003-2004. But that was a different time with a different concern — deflation — and we were intentionally seeking to prevent prices from falling. Recently we have had reason to be worried about rising inflation, not declining prices.

The FOMC’s reductions in the federal funds rate have been proactive in responding to evolving economic conditions that led to the deterioration in the outlook for economic growth. My inclination to alter monetary policy depends on whether the accumulation of evidence based on the data between now and our next meeting causes me to revise my forecast further. Weaker than expected data might lead to a downward revision, while stronger than expected data may lead to an upward revision to the forecast.

To make this point concrete, last Friday the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the economy lost 17,000 jobs in January. External Link This was not an encouraging number. However, it was consistent with my forecast of weak employment growth in the first quarter of this year. Thus, by itself, it does not lead to a substantive revision to my forecast. We must look at the accumulation of data from a variety of sources to assess how the outlook may have changed relative to what was expected.

I also want to note that in early January there was much concern when the BLS reported only 18,000 jobs were created in December. Yet in the employment report last Friday that preliminary number was revised up to 82,000. Thus, we have to realize that economic data are subject to revision, and we have to be very careful not to rely on any one statistic or data series in assessing current economic conditions or our outlook.

There are those who have expressed the view that in times of economic weakness, the Fed must not worry about inflation and should focus its entire effort on restoring economic growth by dramatically driving interest rates down as far and as rapidly as possible. To borrow a line attributed to that famous, or perhaps infamous, Union Admiral David Farragut at the Battle of Mobile Bay, it is sort of a “damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead” approach to policy. But the Fed has a dual mandate for a reason. Price stability is a necessary component for achieving sustained economic growth. Ignoring price stability during times of economic weakness risks undermining our ability to achieve economic growth over the long run. It fuels higher inflation down the road and risks inappropriate risk taking and recurring boom/bust cycles. This would be counterproductive.

Although it might be tempting to think that monetary policy is the solution to most, if not all, economic ills, this is not the case. I think it is particularly important, for example, to recognize that monetary policy cannot solve all the problems the economy and financial system now face. It cannot solve the bad debt problems in the mortgage market. It cannot re-price the risks of securities backed by subprime loans. It cannot solve the problems faced by those financial firms at risk of being given lower ratings by rating agencies because some of their assets are now worth much less than previously thought. The markets will have to solve these problems, as indeed they will. But it will take some time. However, the Fed can and should help by offsetting some of the restraint created by tightening credit conditions and the sharp reduction in housing investment. The Fed can and should also promote the orderly functioning of financial markets.

Going forward, then, my approach to making monetary policy decisions will be to look at incoming information and ask whether it is consistent with my outlook and the achievement of the Fed’s dual mandate. My outlook for 2008 already incorporates the fact that we will be receiving quite a few weak economic numbers in the first half of the year. However, to the extent that economic conditions evolve differently than expected, we will need to be prepared to incorporate those changing conditions into our policy decisions in a manner that is consistent with our dual mandate.
Conclusion

In conclusion, my own forecast for economic activity has been revised downward since last October as economic conditions have evolved. I believe the recent reductions in the level of the federal funds rate target will be supportive of the economic adjustment process and a return to trend growth near the end of this year and on into 2009. The Fed has been aggressive in making this adjustment in rates, which will mitigate some, but not all, of the problems the economy and financial markets are facing. Some problems will simply take time for the financial markets to work out.

In taking aggressive action in supporting the economy’s eventual return to its trend growth rate, I continue to believe we must not lose sight of the other part of the Fed’s dual mandate – which is price stability. We cannot be confident that a slow-growing economy in early 2008 will by itself reduce inflation. I am also convinced that we need to keep our eye on both headline as well as core inflation in assessing how well we are doing in achieving our goal of price stability.

Going forward, monetary policy decisions will depend on how the economy unfolds and whether further changes in the economic outlook are necessary.

Again, let me thank Philip Jackson and the Rotary Club for inviting me to return to speak here in Birmingham.

* The views expressed today are my own and not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve System or the FOMC.

[뉴스핌 베스트 기사]

사진
관세협상 쟁점…쌀·쇠고기·구글지도 [세종=뉴스핌] 최영수 선임기자 = 한미 관세협상이 막판까지 '진통'을 겪고 있다. 오는 8일 1일까지 관세 유예기한이 연장되면서 일단 3주간 시간을 벌었다. 하지만 이견을 좁히지 못한 쟁점이 여전히 남아 있어 앞으로의 협상도 난항이 예상된다. 수차례 협상에도 이견을 좁히지 못한 것은 결국 '비관세장벽' 때문이다. 특히 한국 측이 민감분야로 설정하고 있는 ▲쌀 시장 개방 ▲30개월 이상 쇠고기 수입 허용 ▲구글 정밀지도 반출 허용 등 3가지 쟁점이 분수령이 될 전망이다. ◆ '제조업 협력' 카드 제시했지만…美, 농축산물 개방까지 요구 미국 정부는 오는 8월 1일부터 한국에 대한 품목관세(25%)를 부과할 방침이라고 8일 밝혔다. 도널드 트럼프 대통령은 8일 오전 1시 20분(한국시간) 트루스소셜(Truth Social)을 통해 한국에 대한 상호관세율 및 발효일자 등이 포함된 서한을 공개했다고 밝혔다. 이는 지난 4월 2일 발표한 국가별 관세와 같은 수준이다. 협상 시한이 3주간 연장된 셈이다. 도널드 트럼프 미국 대통령 [사진=로이터 뉴스핌] 한국 정부는 앞서 미국 측에 '제조업 협력 로드맵'을 제시했지만, 이것만으로는 미국 측의 합의를 이끌어내지 못한 것으로 알려졌다. 한국 측이 농축산물 등 민감분야를 사수하면서 '제조업 협력' 카드만으로 협상을 진행해 왔지만, 결국 한계에 봉착한 것 아니냐는 분석이 나온다. 산업부는 "새 정부 출범 이후 짧은 시간동안 국익 최우선 원칙을 갖고 치열하게 협상에 임했으나 현실적으로 모든 이슈들에 대해 합의 도출까지 시간이 부족했다"고 밝혔다. ◆ 자동차·철강 품목관세 인하 vs 농·축산물 개방 '저울질' 한미 간 몇 차례 협상에도 진통을 겪고 있는 이유는 결국 미국 정부가 농축산물 시장까지 요구하고 있기 때문이다. 더불어 한국의 정밀지도를 구글에 허용해 달라는 요구 역시 한국 정부로서는 민감한 쟁점이어서 난항이 예상된다. 한국 정부의 목표는 이 같은 민감분야를 사수하면서 자동차·철강 품목관세를 경쟁국 대비 불리하지 않은 수준으로 인하하는 것이다. 여한구 산업통상자원부 통상교섭본부장은 지난 6일 협상 결과에 대해 "자동차와 철강 등 품목관세 철폐 또는 완화가 반드시 포함돼야 한다"고 못 박았다. 여한구 산업통상자원부 통상교섭본부장(오른쪽)과 제이미슨 그리어(Jamieson Greer) USTR 대표가 5일 오후(현지시간) 미국 워싱턴 D.C.에서 관세협상에 앞서 기념사진을 찍고 있다. [사진=산업통상자원부] 2025.07.06 dream@newspim.com 문제는 농업계와 소관부처(농림축산식품부)를 어떻게 설득하느냐다. 과거 정부도 쌀 시장 개방과 쇠고기 수입을 검토했다가 강한 저항에 부딪혀 보류한 바 있다. 정부 안팎에서는 품목관세를 완전히 철폐하는 조건이라면 농축산물 시장을 개방하는 것도 고려해 볼만하다는 분위기가 읽힌다. 산업부는 8일 미국 정부의 발표에 대해 "미국 측의 주된 관심사인 무역적자 해소를 위한 국내 제도 개선, 규제 합리화 등과 함께, 양국 간 제조업 르네상스 파트너십을 통해 핵심산업 도약의 기회로 활용할 계획"이라고 밝혔다. 이는 한국 측의 요구대로 자동차, 철강 등 품목관세를 원하는 수준으로 인하(철폐)될 경우, 미국 측이 요구하고 있는 비관세장벽 개선에 대해서도 전향적으로 검토할 수 있다는 뜻으로 해석된다. 결국 품목관세 철폐와 비관세장벽 개선 두 가지 요소를 놓고 얼마나 균형적이고 합리적이 수준으로 타결되느냐가 관건이 될 전망이다. 한국 정부가 '상호호혜적이고 균형적인 협상'을 기본 원칙으로 내세우는 것도 이 때문이다. 산업부는 "관세로 인한 불확실성을 조속히 해소하기 위해 남은 기간 동안 상호 호혜적인 협상결과 도출을 위해 협상에 박차를 가할 것"이라고 강조했다. dream@newspim.com 2025-07-08 11:38
사진
'어느덧 20살' 슈퍼주니어 [서울=뉴스핌] 오광수 문화전문기자 = 슈퍼주니어(SUPER JUNIOR, 에스엠엔터테인먼트 소속)가 8일 정규 12집 'Super Junior25'(슈퍼주니어 이오)로 컴백했다. 이번 앨범은 슈퍼주니어 데뷔 20주년을 기념하는 앨범이다. 총 9곡이 수록되어 있으며, 타이틀 곡은 'Express Mode'(익스프레스 모드)다. 'Express Mode'는 댄서블한 사운드와 중독적인 후렴구가 특징인 업템포 클럽 팝 곡으로, 가사에는 현재에 멈추지 않고 다음 목표를 향해 나아가고자 하는 패기 넘치는 태도를 담았다. 어느덧 20년이 된 슈퍼주니어가 컴백을 기념하여 일문일답을 진행했다. [서울=뉴스핌] 오광수 문화전문기자 = 데뷔 20주년을 맞은 슈퍼주니어.[사진= SM엔터테인먼트] 2025.07.08 oks34@newspim.com 1. 드디어 정규 12집, 데뷔 20주년 기념 앨범이 발매되는 소감은?- 이특: 슈퍼주니어가 20년을 함께했다. 저 역시 너무나 놀라운 시간이었는데, 이번 앨범을 시작으로 앞으로 더욱 놀라운 시간을 만들어 가도록 하겠다.- 시원: 믿기지 않을 만큼 긴 시간이었던 것 같다. 하지만 그만큼 값진 시간이었다. 지금까지 함께해 준 멤버들, 스태프들, 그리고 무엇보다 변함없이 곁을 지켜준 팬분들 덕분에 이 앨범이 더욱 의미 있게 완성될 수 있었던 것 같아 감사하다. 2. 앨범명도 특별하다. 'Super Junior05'에서 'Super Junior25'가 됐는데, 슈퍼주니어에게 있어 가장 많이 바뀐 것과 그래도 여전히 바뀌지 않은 것은 무엇인지?- 희철: 가장 많이 바뀐 것은 저의 외모. 이번 앨범 준비하면서 다이어트도 하고 식단도 했는데… 여전히 바뀌지 않은 것은 이특, 은혁의 동안력과 몸무게. 둘을 보며 좋은 자극을 많이 받는다.- 예성: 정신 연령? ㅎㅎ 우리는 아직 20대 같다.- 려욱: 멤버들의 입담과 '티키타카'는 변함없는 것 같다. 대본 없이 우리끼리 카메라 하나 두고도 콘텐츠 백만 개는 나올 것 같다. [서울=뉴스핌] 오광수 문화전문기자 = 데뷔 20주년을 맞은 슈퍼주니어. [사진= SM엔터테인먼트] 2025.07.08 oks34@newspim.com 3. '히트곡 부자'로 유명한 만큼 타이틀 곡을 정하면서도 많은 고민이 있었을 것 같은데, 'Express Mode'가 선정된 이유가 있다면?- 예성: 다른 좋은 곡들도 많았지만 이 노래가 가장 '타이틀 곡' 같다고 느껴졌다.- 신동: 저희는 항상 새로운 걸 시도하려고 하지 않나, 이번에도 고민 진짜 많이 했다. 그런데 'Express Mode'를 듣자마자 다들 "이거다!" 싶었다. 슈퍼주니어다운 에너지와 재치, 그리고 요즘 감성까지 딱 잘 버무려진 곡이라, 들으면 그냥 바로 타이틀! 하는 느낌이다.- 은혁: 20주년이라는 숫자와 지금의 위치에 안주하지 않고 앞으로도 한발 한발 더 나아가겠다는 의미도 있고, 음악과 퍼포먼스도 우리를 잘 표현할 수 있다는 생각이 들었다.- 려욱: 데모 들을 때만 해도 'Haircut'에 한 표를 던졌던 나였지만, 녹음을 하고 보니 'Express Mode'가 우리의 에너지를 잘 담고 있었고 퍼포먼스까지 멋지게 보여줄 수 있을 거라 생각돼서 인정하게 됐다. 4. 최근 일상에서 나를 제일 'Express Mode'로 설레게 혹은 달리게 만드는 것은?- 희철: 반려견 기복이 산책.(웃음) 기복이 활동량이 상당해서 하루에 몇 번씩 산책을 하는데 이리 뛰고, 저리 뛰고 아주 난리도 아니다. 기복이가 저를 미친 듯이 달리게 만든다.- 예성: E.L.F.들과 어서 만나고 싶다는 생각이 저를 'Express Mode'로 달리게 만든다. 우리 더 가까워지자!- 려욱: 노래 연습을 꾸준히 하고 있다. E.L.F.들에게 멋진 노래를 들려주고 싶고, 하루빨리 콘서트로 보답하고 싶은 마음이다.- 규현: 퇴근 후 접속하는 '33 원정대'.(웃음) 오랜만에 빠지게 된 게임이다. [서울=뉴스핌] 오광수 문화전문기자 = 데뷔 20주년을 맞은 슈퍼주니어. [사진= SM엔터테인먼트] 2025.07.08 oks34@newspim.com 5. 타이틀 곡 'Express Mode' 퍼포먼스, 준비하면서 어렵지는 않았는지?- 예성: 디스크 때문에 조금 고생했지만 안무가 좋아서 더 열심히 했다.- 신동: 솔직히… 좀 힘들었다. 하하! 퍼포먼스가 진짜 'Express Mode'로 달려야 해서, 예전처럼 체력으로만 밀어붙이긴 어렵더라. 대신 디테일한 표현, 팀워크를 더 살리려고 노력했다. 근데 또 무대 올라가면 신기하게 힘이 난다. E.L.F. 앞이라 그런가 보다.- 은혁: 멤버들 모두 즐거운 분위기 속에서 열심히 잘 준비했다. 그래서 그런지 전혀 어렵지 않았다.(웃음) 6. 앨범 콘셉트인 'SUPER AWARDS'처럼 서로에게 주고 싶은 상 이름을 직접 정해본다면?- 신동: 은혁이한테 '몸이 한 개로 부족했상'을 주고 싶다. 안무 짜랴, 디렉팅 보랴, 촬영 챙기랴… 진짜 슈퍼 히어로다. 그리고 희철이 형한테는 '말은 많았지만 행동도 많았상', 은근히 뒤에서 멤버들 챙기고 조용히 마음 써준 거 다 알고 있다. 나머지 멤버들에겐? '아직도 이렇게 잘생겼상' 드린다. 왜냐면… 정말 아직도 잘생겼으니까.(웃음)- 려욱: '너네가 짱이야 상' 7. 지난 20주년을 돌아보며 가장 기억에 남는 순간은 언제인지?- 시원: 나이가 드는지 데뷔 무대가 갑자기 기억이 난다.- 려욱: 데뷔했던 순간이 제일 마음에 와 닿는다. 무중력 상태에서 우주를 떠다니듯 춤추고 노래했던 기억이 난다. 꺼진 마이크에 크게 목놓아 부른 'Twins'는 아직도 잊지 못한다.- 규현: 'SUPER SHOW' 투어를 다닐 때인 것 같다. 어느새 너무 오랜 시간 공연을 해와서 기억도 뒤죽박죽이긴 하지만 역시 남는 건 벅차게 느꼈던 공연 순간의 감동이다. [서울=뉴스핌] 오광수 문화전문기자 = 데뷔 20주년을 맞은 슈퍼주니어. [사진= SM엔터테인먼트] 2025.07.08 oks34@newspim.com 8. 슈퍼주니어하면 콘서트도 빼놓을 수 없는데, 'SUPER SHOW 10' 투어가 곧 시작된다. 200회 공연도 앞두고 있는데, 앞으로 새롭게 세워보고 싶은 기록이 있다면?- 이특: 숫자에 대한 기록이라면 300회, 400회, 계속해서 새로운 숫자를 써 나가는 것이 목표다. 그리고 시간이 더 흘렀을 때 'SUPER SHOW'가 더욱 다양한 콘텐츠로 새롭게 재탄생하기를 바라본다.- 예성: 기록에 대해선 큰 생각은 없지만 하다 보니 200회 공연이 되다니 신기하다. 벌써 우리가 이렇게 오래 공연을 하고 있다니!- 려욱: 300회까지 가면 좋을 것 같다. 슈퍼주니어 멤버들과 관객들과 함께하는 시간들이 쌓일수록 그 횟수가 어떻든 행복할 것 같다.- 규현: 가보지 못했던 곳들도 갈 수 있었으면 좋겠다. 전 세계에 E.L.F.가 살게 되는 기록도 꿈꿔본다! 9. 슈퍼주니어에게 붙는 수식어가 많은데, 제일 마음에 드는 것은? 앞으로 어떤 수식어를 더 만들어가고 싶은지?- 은혁: 너무 거창한 수식어들은 솔직히 좀 민망하고 쑥스러운 것 같다. 그냥… '수식어가 필요 없는 그룹' 슈퍼주니어라는 표현이 가장 좋지 않을까?- 려욱: '한류 광개토대왕'이 제일 좋다. 어렸을 때 광개토대왕을 좋아해서 그런지 몰라도… 내 마음에 콕 박힌다. 10. 이번 앨범으로 이루고 싶은 목표는?- 희철: 이제 우리가 무슨 바라는 목표가 있겠나… 무탈히 즐겁게 활동 잘 마치길 바란다. 사랑한다 멤버들아!! 건강하자!!- 예성: 활동 끝까지 무사히 잘 해내고 싶다. 즐겁고 행복하게 마무리하고 싶은 마음이다.- 시원: 이번 앨범은 단순한 앨범이 아니라, 저희가 걸어온 20년의 시간과 그 안에 담긴 이야기들을 다음 세대에게 전하고 싶은 마음이 크다. 이 여정이 누군가에겐 시작점의 작은 용기나 희망이 되고, 후배들에게는 '이렇게 꾸준히, 진심으로 해 나가면 가능하구나'라는 좋은 선례가 되었으면 한다. 11. 20년 동안 슈퍼주니어를 지켜준 E.L.F.에게 한 마디- 이특: 한결같이 우리를 응원해주고 사랑해주는 E.L.F.! 이제는 우리가 받았던 사랑을 돌려주고, 그 사랑에 보답하기 위해 노력하겠다. 늘 고맙고 사랑한다!- 동해: E.L.F.가 없었다면 모든 것이 불가능이라고 말하고 싶다. 아무리 꽃이 예뻐도 하늘에 햇빛이 없고 물을 주지 않으면 시들듯이, 우리는 E.L.F.라는 존재가 없으면 내일 당장 시들어 버릴 거다. E.L.F.에게 너무 고맙고 앞으로도 잘 부탁한다. 진심으로 사랑해!- 려욱: 우리와 함께해 준 영원한 친구 E.L.F.들 정말 고마워. 함께 울고 웃던 시간들이 너무 소중하다. 내 인생에 큰 선물이고 오래오래 기억하고 싶어. 20주년 너무 감사하고 우리 앞으로 함께하자. 사랑해. 슈퍼주니어는 8월부터 데뷔 20주년 기념 투어 'SUPER SHOW 10'(슈퍼쇼 10)에 돌입한다. 투어의 막을 올리는 서울 공연은 8월 22~24일 올림픽공원 KSPO DOME에서 개최된다. 또한 서울 공연을 시작으로 9월 홍콩, 자카르타, 10월 마닐라, 멕시코시티, 몬테레이, 리마, 산티아고, 11월 타이베이, 방콕, 12월 나고야, 2026년 1월 싱가포르, 마카오, 쿠알라룸푸르, 가오슝, 3월 사이타마까지 슈퍼주니어는 전 세계 16개 지역에서 투어를 이어가며 '레전드 공연킹'다운 면모를 보여주고 20주년을 화려하게 마무리할 전망이다. oks34@newspim.com 2025-07-08 13:40
안다쇼핑
Top으로 이동